javayankee
New member
I appreciate your comments unit_number_43...it's clear you know the Starbucks menu well. And it's true...that caramel drink really should be called a Vanilla Latte, Affogato style with caramel drizzle...granted, that's a mouthful and another name would be much easier to market. But I think it really *is* a misnomaer to call it a caramel machiatto...and not really being anal. Truth is, Starbucks has a very large megaphone at its disposal and what they do affects trends. So when a large company like this starts to blur the lines of what is already something rather esoteric for most americans (espresso drinks) it is actually kind of damaging to education of the public at large. Another example is of this is the "espresso roast". Most people feel espresso is a type of roast for a bean, when of course the truth is espresso is a drink, not a roast level. With the power Starbucks has also comes responsibility. Don't get me wrong though...I have plenty of positive things to say about them as well, but this is one of my bigger beefs.
unit_number_43 said:what you're describing is an espresso machiatto. traditionally a shot with just alittle bit of milk on top. the carmel machiatto however is a full drink. if you wanted to call it a latte it would be a Vanilla Latte, Affigato style, with caramel drizzle. saying that a caramel machiatto is a misnomer is just being anal. Next you're going to say that the Frappacino doesn't actually come with a pair of nice slacks. Maybe the name was butchered, but it's now very obvious as to what yo'ure getting.
It does bother me that the "caramel" drinks don't usually have any caramel in them. Caramel Apple Cider for instance only has caramel on top, not actually in the drink.