Redswing
New member
Thoughts after spending about a year addicted to this forum:
I ran across this article last night Metonymy Media | AHA! Moments with Roasted Beans and found myself resonating with the roaster being interviewed. I loved his approach to specialty coffee.
I'm the kind of guy who in all things can respect pretty much anybody for saying pretty much anything as long as they aren't saying it with the kind of certainty that gets irked if the audience doesn't take it as truth. People need to buy-in to your certainty on their own after experiencing what it is you believe in. Some people like to be told what to do while other people bristle. I tend to bristle. To me, it's a matter of being an effective communicator. You say something with certainty when somebody else doesn't understand (yet), you lose them.
The guys attitude was classy in my book, a good example of what I'm trying to say. Here's a part that especially caught my eye:
the interviewer: I have to be candid. This is the point in most conversations about food or drink
when I begin to lose trust. You can get lost in the noise of artisans and
gourmands touting their association names, making promises of freshness, of
being local or organic or quality or better than the rest. So I asked,
pretty pointedly, what the roaster thought about the chains. Why is what he is
doing better? Why will people care?
“Starbucks is doing great stuff,” he said. “They’re introducing people to a
wide world of coffee, and I don’t want to say that my coffee is the right way to
do coffee. That’s not the point. The point is to introduce people to something
they’ve never seen before.”
He smiled as he spoke, and he was also very serious.
I'd include more, because there is more context, but without risking too long a ramble...
What do you guys think of this idea?
I ran across this article last night Metonymy Media | AHA! Moments with Roasted Beans and found myself resonating with the roaster being interviewed. I loved his approach to specialty coffee.
I'm the kind of guy who in all things can respect pretty much anybody for saying pretty much anything as long as they aren't saying it with the kind of certainty that gets irked if the audience doesn't take it as truth. People need to buy-in to your certainty on their own after experiencing what it is you believe in. Some people like to be told what to do while other people bristle. I tend to bristle. To me, it's a matter of being an effective communicator. You say something with certainty when somebody else doesn't understand (yet), you lose them.
The guys attitude was classy in my book, a good example of what I'm trying to say. Here's a part that especially caught my eye:
the interviewer: I have to be candid. This is the point in most conversations about food or drink
when I begin to lose trust. You can get lost in the noise of artisans and
gourmands touting their association names, making promises of freshness, of
being local or organic or quality or better than the rest. So I asked,
pretty pointedly, what the roaster thought about the chains. Why is what he is
doing better? Why will people care?
“Starbucks is doing great stuff,” he said. “They’re introducing people to a
wide world of coffee, and I don’t want to say that my coffee is the right way to
do coffee. That’s not the point. The point is to introduce people to something
they’ve never seen before.”
He smiled as he spoke, and he was also very serious.
I'd include more, because there is more context, but without risking too long a ramble...
What do you guys think of this idea?
Last edited: